lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*

Browse Source 
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion.  Rename them to
ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo
2007-12-18 16:34:43 -05:00
committed by Jeff Garzik
parent 537b53c169
commit 0dc36888d4
13 changed files with 52 additions and 55 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
View File

@@ -1299,10 +1299,10 @@ static unsigned int atapi_eh_request_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
/* is it pointless to prefer PIO for "safety reasons"? */
if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_PIO_DMA) {
tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
} else {
tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
tf.lbam = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
tf.lbah = 0;
}
@@ -1979,8 +1979,8 @@ static void ata_eh_link_report(struct ata_link *link)
[ATA_PROT_PIO] = "pio",
[ATA_PROT_DMA] = "dma",
[ATA_PROT_NCQ] = "ncq",
[ATA_PROT_ATAPI] = "pio",
[ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA] = "dma",
[ATAPI_PROT_PIO] = "pio",
[ATAPI_PROT_DMA] = "dma",
};
snprintf(data_buf, sizeof(data_buf), " %s %u %s",