libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@ -2354,10 +2354,10 @@ static void atapi_request_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
|
||||
qc->tf.command = ATA_CMD_PACKET;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ata_pio_use_silly(ap)) {
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
|
||||
qc->tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
|
||||
qc->tf.lbam = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
|
||||
qc->tf.lbah = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2528,12 +2528,12 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
|
||||
if (using_pio || nodata) {
|
||||
/* no data, or PIO data xfer */
|
||||
if (nodata)
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA;
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_NODATA;
|
||||
else
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* DMA data xfer */
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
|
||||
qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
|
||||
qc->tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
|
||||
|
||||
if (atapi_dmadir && (scmd->sc_data_direction != DMA_TO_DEVICE))
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user