[PATCH] ppc64: SMU partition recovery

This patch adds the ability to the SMU driver to recover missing
calibration partitions from the SMU chip itself. It also adds some
dynamic mecanism to /proc/device-tree so that new properties are visible
to userland.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-07 14:29:02 +11:00
committed by Paul Mackerras
parent 4350147a81
commit 183d020258
10 changed files with 382 additions and 58 deletions

View File

@@ -48,6 +48,39 @@ static int property_read_proc(char *page, char **start, off_t off,
* and "@10" to it.
*/
/*
* Add a property to a node
*/
static struct proc_dir_entry *
__proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *de, struct property *pp)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *ent;
/*
* Unfortunately proc_register puts each new entry
* at the beginning of the list. So we rearrange them.
*/
ent = create_proc_read_entry(pp->name,
strncmp(pp->name, "security-", 9)
? S_IRUGO : S_IRUSR, de,
property_read_proc, pp);
if (ent == NULL)
return NULL;
if (!strncmp(pp->name, "security-", 9))
ent->size = 0; /* don't leak number of password chars */
else
ent->size = pp->length;
return ent;
}
void proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct property *prop)
{
__proc_device_tree_add_prop(pde, prop);
}
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -57,11 +90,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
struct property *pp;
struct proc_dir_entry *ent;
struct device_node *child;
struct proc_dir_entry *list = NULL, **lastp;
const char *p;
set_node_proc_entry(np, de);
lastp = &list;
for (child = NULL; (child = of_get_next_child(np, child));) {
p = strrchr(child->full_name, '/');
if (!p)
@@ -71,9 +102,6 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
ent = proc_mkdir(p, de);
if (ent == 0)
break;
*lastp = ent;
ent->next = NULL;
lastp = &ent->next;
proc_device_tree_add_node(child, ent);
}
of_node_put(child);
@@ -84,7 +112,7 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
* properties are quite unimportant for us though, thus we
* simply "skip" them here, but we do have to check.
*/
for (ent = list; ent != NULL; ent = ent->next)
for (ent = de->subdir; ent != NULL; ent = ent->next)
if (!strcmp(ent->name, pp->name))
break;
if (ent != NULL) {
@@ -94,25 +122,10 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
continue;
}
/*
* Unfortunately proc_register puts each new entry
* at the beginning of the list. So we rearrange them.
*/
ent = create_proc_read_entry(pp->name,
strncmp(pp->name, "security-", 9)
? S_IRUGO : S_IRUSR, de,
property_read_proc, pp);
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp);
if (ent == 0)
break;
if (!strncmp(pp->name, "security-", 9))
ent->size = 0; /* don't leak number of password chars */
else
ent->size = pp->length;
ent->next = NULL;
*lastp = ent;
lastp = &ent->next;
}
de->subdir = list;
}
/*