[PATCH] linearly index zone->node_zonelists[]

I wonder why we need this bitmask indexing into zone->node_zonelists[]?

We always start with the highest zone and then include all lower zones
if we build zonelists.

Are there really cases where we need allocation from ZONE_DMA or
ZONE_HIGHMEM but not ZONE_NORMAL? It seems that the current implementation
of highest_zone() makes that already impossible.

If we go linear on the index then gfp_zone() == highest_zone() and a lot
of definitions fall by the wayside.

We can now revert back to the use of gfp_zone() in mempolicy.c ;-)

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 23:31:19 -07:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 2f6726e54a
commit 19655d3487
4 changed files with 18 additions and 75 deletions

View File

@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static struct zonelist *zonelist_policy(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
case MPOL_BIND:
/* Lower zones don't get a policy applied */
/* Careful: current->mems_allowed might have moved */
if (highest_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone)
if (gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone)
if (cpuset_zonelist_valid_mems_allowed(policy->v.zonelist))
return policy->v.zonelist;
/*FALL THROUGH*/