[JFFS2] Invert last argument of jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(), make it boolean.
We don't actually care about nlink; we only care whether the inode in question is unlinked or not. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
@ -586,11 +586,12 @@ void jffs2_gc_release_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct jffs2_inode_info *jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
|
||||
int inum, int nlink)
|
||||
int inum, int unlinked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct inode *inode;
|
||||
struct jffs2_inode_cache *ic;
|
||||
if (!nlink) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlinked) {
|
||||
/* The inode has zero nlink but its nodes weren't yet marked
|
||||
obsolete. This has to be because we're still waiting for
|
||||
the final (close() and) iput() to happen.
|
||||
@ -638,8 +639,8 @@ struct jffs2_inode_info *jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
|
||||
return ERR_CAST(inode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Eep. read_inode() failed for ino #%u. nlink %d\n",
|
||||
inum, nlink);
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Eep. read_inode() failed for ino #%u. unlinked %d\n",
|
||||
inum, unlinked);
|
||||
/* NB. This will happen again. We need to do something appropriate here. */
|
||||
iput(inode);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user