net: dsa: slave: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD/_DEL

Following patches will change the way of distributing port object
changes from a switchdev operation to a switchdev notifier. The
switchdev code currently recursively descends through layers of lower
devices, eventually calling the op on a front-panel port device. The
notifier will instead be sent referencing the bridge port device, which
may be a stacking device that's one of front-panel ports uppers, or a
completely unrelated device.

DSA currently doesn't support any other uppers than bridge.
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB and _PORT_MDB objects are always notified on
the bridge port device. Thus the only case that a stacked device could
be validly referenced by port object notifications are bridge
notifications for VLAN objects added to the bridge itself. But the
driver explicitly rejects such notifications in dsa_port_vlan_add(). It
is therefore safe to assume that the only interesting case is that the
notification is on a front-panel port netdevice. Therefore keep the
filtering by dsa_slave_dev_check() in place.

To handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL, subscribe to the blocking
notifier chain. Dispatch to rocker_port_obj_add() resp. _del() to
maintain the behavior that the switchdev operation based code currently
has.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Petr Machata 2018-11-22 23:29:05 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent c6fa35b237
commit 2b239f6780

View File

@ -1557,6 +1557,44 @@ static int dsa_slave_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
return NOTIFY_BAD;
}
static int
dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event,
struct net_device *netdev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info)
{
int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
switch (event) {
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD:
err = dsa_slave_port_obj_add(netdev, port_obj_info->obj,
port_obj_info->trans);
break;
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
err = dsa_slave_port_obj_del(netdev, port_obj_info->obj);
break;
}
port_obj_info->handled = true;
return notifier_from_errno(err);
}
static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
if (!dsa_slave_dev_check(dev))
return NOTIFY_DONE;
switch (event) {
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD: /* fall through */
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
return dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(event, dev, ptr);
}
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_nb __read_mostly = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_netdevice_event,
};
@ -1565,8 +1603,13 @@ static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_event,
};
static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event,
};
int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
{
struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
err = register_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
@ -1577,8 +1620,15 @@ int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
if (err)
goto err_switchdev_nb;
nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
err = register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
if (err)
goto err_switchdev_blocking_nb;
return 0;
err_switchdev_blocking_nb:
unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
err_switchdev_nb:
unregister_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
return err;
@ -1586,8 +1636,14 @@ int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
void dsa_slave_unregister_notifier(void)
{
struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
err = unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
if (err)
pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev blocking notifier (%d)\n", err);
err = unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
if (err)
pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev notifier (%d)\n", err);