memcg: revert gfp mask fix

My patch, memcg-fix-gfp_mask-of-callers-of-charge.patch changed gfp_mask
of callers of charge to be GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE for showing what will
happen at memory reclaim.

But in recent discussion, it's NACKed because it sounds ugly.

This patch is for reverting it and add some clean up to gfp_mask of
callers of charge.  No behavior change but need review before generating
HUNK in deep queue.

This patch also adds explanation to meaning of gfp_mask passed to charge
functions in memcontrol.h.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-07 18:08:10 -08:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 887007561a
commit 2c26fdd70c
6 changed files with 25 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@ -932,8 +932,8 @@ found:
* Charge page using GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE while we can wait.
* charged back to the user(not to caller) when swap account is used.
*/
error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(page,
current->mm, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, true);
error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(page, current->mm, GFP_KERNEL,
true);
if (error)
goto out;
error = radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ repeat:
* charge against this swap cache here.
*/
if (mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(swappage,
current->mm, gfp, false)) {
current->mm, gfp & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, false)) {
page_cache_release(swappage);
error = -ENOMEM;
goto failed;
@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ repeat:
/* Precharge page while we can wait, compensate after */
error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(filepage, current->mm,
GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
GFP_KERNEL);
if (error) {
page_cache_release(filepage);
shmem_unacct_blocks(info->flags, 1);