lguest: fix comment style
I don't really notice it (except to begrudge the extra vertical space), but Ingo does. And he pointed out that one excuse of lguest is as a teaching tool, it should set a good example. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
|
||||
/*P:500 Just as userspace programs request kernel operations through a system
|
||||
/*P:500
|
||||
* Just as userspace programs request kernel operations through a system
|
||||
* call, the Guest requests Host operations through a "hypercall". You might
|
||||
* notice this nomenclature doesn't really follow any logic, but the name has
|
||||
* been around for long enough that we're stuck with it. As you'd expect, this
|
||||
* code is basically a one big switch statement. :*/
|
||||
* code is basically a one big switch statement.
|
||||
:*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Copyright (C) 2006 Rusty Russell IBM Corporation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,30 +30,41 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
|
||||
#include "lg.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/*H:120 This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it wants.
|
||||
* Or gets killed. Or, in the case of LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, both. */
|
||||
/*H:120
|
||||
* This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it wants.
|
||||
* Or gets killed. Or, in the case of LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, both.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (args->arg0) {
|
||||
case LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC:
|
||||
/* This call does nothing, except by breaking out of the Guest
|
||||
* it makes us process all the asynchronous hypercalls. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This call does nothing, except by breaking out of the Guest
|
||||
* it makes us process all the asynchronous hypercalls.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case LHCALL_SEND_INTERRUPTS:
|
||||
/* This call does nothing too, but by breaking out of the Guest
|
||||
* it makes us process any pending interrupts. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This call does nothing too, but by breaking out of the Guest
|
||||
* it makes us process any pending interrupts.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT:
|
||||
/* You can't get here unless you're already initialized. Don't
|
||||
* do that. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* You can't get here unless you're already initialized. Don't
|
||||
* do that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "already have lguest_data");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case LHCALL_SHUTDOWN: {
|
||||
/* Shutdown is such a trivial hypercall that we do it in four
|
||||
* lines right here. */
|
||||
char msg[128];
|
||||
/* If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
|
||||
* kill_guest() with the message will be ignored. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Shutdown is such a trivial hypercall that we do it in four
|
||||
* lines right here.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
|
||||
* kill_guest() with the message will be ignored.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__lgread(cpu, msg, args->arg1, sizeof(msg));
|
||||
msg[sizeof(msg)-1] = '\0';
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "CRASH: %s", msg);
|
||||
@@ -60,16 +73,17 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB:
|
||||
/* FLUSH_TLB comes in two flavors, depending on the
|
||||
* argument: */
|
||||
/* FLUSH_TLB comes in two flavors, depending on the argument: */
|
||||
if (args->arg1)
|
||||
guest_pagetable_clear_all(cpu);
|
||||
else
|
||||
guest_pagetable_flush_user(cpu);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* All these calls simply pass the arguments through to the right
|
||||
* routines. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* All these calls simply pass the arguments through to the right
|
||||
* routines.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
case LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE:
|
||||
guest_new_pagetable(cpu, args->arg1);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@@ -112,15 +126,16 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "Bad hypercall %li\n", args->arg0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*:*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*H:124 Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the
|
||||
/*H:124
|
||||
* Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the
|
||||
* Guest's "struct lguest_data" to see if any new ones are marked "ready".
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We are careful to do these in order: obviously we respect the order the
|
||||
* Guest put them in the ring, but we also promise the Guest that they will
|
||||
* happen before any normal hypercall (which is why we check this before
|
||||
* checking for a normal hcall). */
|
||||
* checking for a normal hcall).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void do_async_hcalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
@@ -133,22 +148,28 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
/* We process "struct lguest_data"s hcalls[] ring once. */
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st); i++) {
|
||||
struct hcall_args args;
|
||||
/* We remember where we were up to from last time. This makes
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We remember where we were up to from last time. This makes
|
||||
* sure that the hypercalls are done in the order the Guest
|
||||
* places them in the ring. */
|
||||
* places them in the ring.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
unsigned int n = cpu->next_hcall;
|
||||
|
||||
/* 0xFF means there's no call here (yet). */
|
||||
if (st[n] == 0xFF)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* OK, we have hypercall. Increment the "next_hcall" cursor,
|
||||
* and wrap back to 0 if we reach the end. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* OK, we have hypercall. Increment the "next_hcall" cursor,
|
||||
* and wrap back to 0 if we reach the end.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (++cpu->next_hcall == LHCALL_RING_SIZE)
|
||||
cpu->next_hcall = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Copy the hypercall arguments into a local copy of
|
||||
* the hcall_args struct. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copy the hypercall arguments into a local copy of the
|
||||
* hcall_args struct.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (copy_from_user(&args, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n],
|
||||
sizeof(struct hcall_args))) {
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "Fetching async hypercalls");
|
||||
@@ -164,19 +185,25 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Stop doing hypercalls if they want to notify the Launcher:
|
||||
* it needs to service this first. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Stop doing hypercalls if they want to notify the Launcher:
|
||||
* it needs to service this first.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cpu->pending_notify)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Last of all, we look at what happens first of all. The very first time the
|
||||
* Guest makes a hypercall, we end up here to set things up: */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Last of all, we look at what happens first of all. The very first time the
|
||||
* Guest makes a hypercall, we end up here to set things up:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void initialize(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* You can't do anything until you're initialized. The Guest knows the
|
||||
* rules, so we're unforgiving here. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* You can't do anything until you're initialized. The Guest knows the
|
||||
* rules, so we're unforgiving here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cpu->hcall->arg0 != LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT) {
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "hypercall %li before INIT", cpu->hcall->arg0);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@@ -185,32 +212,40 @@ static void initialize(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
if (lguest_arch_init_hypercalls(cpu))
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "bad guest page %p", cpu->lg->lguest_data);
|
||||
|
||||
/* The Guest tells us where we're not to deliver interrupts by putting
|
||||
* the range of addresses into "struct lguest_data". */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The Guest tells us where we're not to deliver interrupts by putting
|
||||
* the range of addresses into "struct lguest_data".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (get_user(cpu->lg->noirq_start, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->noirq_start)
|
||||
|| get_user(cpu->lg->noirq_end, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->noirq_end))
|
||||
kill_guest(cpu, "bad guest page %p", cpu->lg->lguest_data);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We write the current time into the Guest's data page once so it can
|
||||
* set its clock. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We write the current time into the Guest's data page once so it can
|
||||
* set its clock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
write_timestamp(cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/* page_tables.c will also do some setup. */
|
||||
page_table_guest_data_init(cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/* This is the one case where the above accesses might have been the
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is the one case where the above accesses might have been the
|
||||
* first write to a Guest page. This may have caused a copy-on-write
|
||||
* fault, but the old page might be (read-only) in the Guest
|
||||
* pagetable. */
|
||||
* pagetable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
guest_pagetable_clear_all(cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*:*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*M:013 If a Guest reads from a page (so creates a mapping) that it has never
|
||||
/*M:013
|
||||
* If a Guest reads from a page (so creates a mapping) that it has never
|
||||
* written to, and then the Launcher writes to it (ie. the output of a virtual
|
||||
* device), the Guest will still see the old page. In practice, this never
|
||||
* happens: why would the Guest read a page which it has never written to? But
|
||||
* a similar scenario might one day bite us, so it's worth mentioning. :*/
|
||||
* a similar scenario might one day bite us, so it's worth mentioning.
|
||||
:*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*H:100
|
||||
* Hypercalls
|
||||
@@ -229,17 +264,22 @@ void do_hypercalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The Guest has initialized.
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The Guest has initialized.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Look in the hypercall ring for the async hypercalls: */
|
||||
* Look in the hypercall ring for the async hypercalls:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
do_async_hcalls(cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we stopped reading the hypercall ring because the Guest did a
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we stopped reading the hypercall ring because the Guest did a
|
||||
* NOTIFY to the Launcher, we want to return now. Otherwise we do
|
||||
* the hypercall. */
|
||||
* the hypercall.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!cpu->pending_notify) {
|
||||
do_hcall(cpu, cpu->hcall);
|
||||
/* Tricky point: we reset the hcall pointer to mark the
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Tricky point: we reset the hcall pointer to mark the
|
||||
* hypercall as "done". We use the hcall pointer rather than
|
||||
* the trap number to indicate a hypercall is pending.
|
||||
* Normally it doesn't matter: the Guest will run again and
|
||||
@@ -248,13 +288,16 @@ void do_hypercalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
* However, if we are signalled or the Guest sends I/O to the
|
||||
* Launcher, the run_guest() loop will exit without running the
|
||||
* Guest. When it comes back it would try to re-run the
|
||||
* hypercall. Finding that bug sucked. */
|
||||
* hypercall. Finding that bug sucked.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cpu->hcall = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* This routine supplies the Guest with time: it's used for wallclock time at
|
||||
* initial boot and as a rough time source if the TSC isn't available. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This routine supplies the Guest with time: it's used for wallclock time at
|
||||
* initial boot and as a rough time source if the TSC isn't available.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void write_timestamp(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct timespec now;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user