[PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector
Occasionally the kernel has bugs that result in no irq being found for a given cpu vector. If we acknowledge the irq the system has a good chance of continuing even though we dropped an irq message. If we continue to simply print a message and not acknowledge the irq the system is likely to become non-responsive shortly there after. AK: Fixed compilation for UP kernels Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "Luigi Genoni" <luigi.genoni@pirelli.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Andi Kleen
parent
bcde1ebb81
commit
2fb12a9bca
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
|
|||||||
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
||||||
#include <asm/io_apic.h>
|
#include <asm/io_apic.h>
|
||||||
#include <asm/idle.h>
|
#include <asm/idle.h>
|
||||||
|
#include <asm/smp.h>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
atomic_t irq_err_count;
|
atomic_t irq_err_count;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -120,9 +121,14 @@ asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (likely(irq < NR_IRQS))
|
if (likely(irq < NR_IRQS))
|
||||||
generic_handle_irq(irq);
|
generic_handle_irq(irq);
|
||||||
else if (printk_ratelimit())
|
else {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector\n",
|
if (!disable_apic)
|
||||||
__func__, smp_processor_id(), vector);
|
ack_APIC_irq();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (printk_ratelimit())
|
||||||
|
printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector\n",
|
||||||
|
__func__, smp_processor_id(), vector);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
irq_exit();
|
irq_exit();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user