x86: Fix section mismatch in LAPIC initialization

Additionally doing things conditionally upon smp_processor_id()
being zero is generally a bad idea, as this means CPU 0 cannot
be offlined and brought back online later again.

While there may be other places where this is done, I think adding
more of those should be avoided so that some day SMP can really
become "symmetrical".

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D525C7E0200007800030EE1@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Jan Beulich
2011-02-09 08:21:02 +00:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 100b33c8bd
commit 2fb270f321
3 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static int __init smp_sanity_check(unsigned max_cpus)
connect_bsp_APIC();
setup_local_APIC();
end_local_APIC_setup();
bsp_end_local_APIC_setup();
return -1;
}
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
if (!skip_ioapic_setup && nr_ioapics)
enable_IO_APIC();
end_local_APIC_setup();
bsp_end_local_APIC_setup();
map_cpu_to_logical_apicid();