leds: Remove incorrect use of preempt_count() from leds-gpio
It appears that we can't just check to see if we're in a task context ... so instead of trying that, just make the relevant leds always schedule a little worklet. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Richard Purdie
parent
d95cbe6158
commit
306dd85c1d
@@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ static void gpio_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
|
|||||||
if (led_dat->active_low)
|
if (led_dat->active_low)
|
||||||
level = !level;
|
level = !level;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* setting GPIOs with I2C/etc requires a preemptible task context */
|
/* Setting GPIOs with I2C/etc requires a task context, and we don't
|
||||||
|
* seem to have a reliable way to know if we're already in one; so
|
||||||
|
* let's just assume the worst.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
if (led_dat->can_sleep) {
|
if (led_dat->can_sleep) {
|
||||||
if (preempt_count()) {
|
led_dat->new_level = level;
|
||||||
led_dat->new_level = level;
|
schedule_work(&led_dat->work);
|
||||||
schedule_work(&led_dat->work);
|
|
||||||
} else
|
|
||||||
gpio_set_value_cansleep(led_dat->gpio, level);
|
|
||||||
} else
|
} else
|
||||||
gpio_set_value(led_dat->gpio, level);
|
gpio_set_value(led_dat->gpio, level);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user