lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

net: correct off-by-one write allocations reports

Browse Source 
commit 2b85a34e91
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
changed initial sk_wmem_alloc value.

We need to take into account this offset when reporting
sk_wmem_alloc to user, in PROC_FS files or various
ioctls (SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ)

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 19:05:41 -07:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent d3b238a03e
commit 31e6d363ab
25 changed files with 58 additions and 51 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
net/rose/af_rose.c
View File

@@ -1309,7 +1309,8 @@ static int rose_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
switch (cmd) {
case TIOCOUTQ: {
long amount;
amount = sk->sk_sndbuf - atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
amount = sk->sk_sndbuf - sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
if (amount < 0)
amount = 0;
return put_user(amount, (unsigned int __user *) argp);
@@ -1480,8 +1481,8 @@ static int rose_info_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
rose->hb / HZ,
ax25_display_timer(&rose->idletimer) / (60 * HZ),
rose->idle / (60 * HZ),
atomic_read(&s->sk_wmem_alloc),
atomic_read(&s->sk_rmem_alloc),
sk_wmem_alloc_get(s),
sk_rmem_alloc_get(s),
s->sk_socket ? SOCK_INODE(s->sk_socket)->i_ino : 0L);
}