lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

rcu: Clean up code based on review feedback from Josh Triplett, part 3

Browse Source 
Whitespace fixes, updated comments, and trivial code movement.

o	Fix whitespace error in RCU_HEAD_INIT()

o	Move "So where is rcu_write_lock()" comment so that it does
	not come between the rcu_read_unlock() header comment and
	the rcu_read_unlock() definition.

o	Move the module_param statements for blimit, qhimark, and
	qlowmark to immediately follow the corresponding
	definitions.

o	In __rcu_offline_cpu(), move the assignment to rdp_me
	inside the "if" statement, given that rdp_me is not used
	outside of that "if" statement.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <12541491931164-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-28 07:46:32 -07:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 162cc2794d
commit 3d76c08290
2 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
include/linux/rcupdate.h
View File

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ extern int rcu_scheduler_active;
#error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration"
#endif
#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL }
#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL }
#define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT
#define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \
(ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \
@@ -129,12 +129,6 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
rcu_read_acquire();
}
/**
* rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* See rcu_read_lock() for more information.
*/
/*
* So where is rcu_write_lock()? It does not exist, as there is no
* way for writers to lock out RCU readers. This is a feature, not
@@ -144,6 +138,12 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
* used as well. RCU does not care how the writers keep out of each
* others' way, as long as they do so.
*/
/**
* rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* See rcu_read_lock() for more information.
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
rcu_read_release();