block: BARRIER request should imply SYNC

A barrier request should by defintion have priority in get_request
and let the queue be unplugged immediately as it's blocking all forward
progress due to the queue draining.

Most filesystems already get this implicitly by the way how submit_bh
treats the buffer_ordered flag, and gfs2 sets it explicitly.  But btrfs
and XFS are still forgetting to set the flag, as is blkdev_issue_flush
and some places in DM/MD.

For XFS on metadata heavy workloads this gives a consistent speedup
in the 2-3% range.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-17 08:54:16 +02:00
committed by Jens Axboe
parent 01b6b67eda
commit 41f2df6289
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
* SWRITE_SYNC
* SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Like WRITE_SYNC/WRITE_SYNC_PLUG, but locks the buffer.
* See SWRITE.
* WRITE_BARRIER Like WRITE, but tells the block layer that all
* WRITE_BARRIER Like WRITE_SYNC, but tells the block layer that all
* previously submitted writes must be safely on storage
* before this one is started. Also guarantees that when
* this write is complete, it itself is also safely on
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
#define SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG \
(SWRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO) | (1 << BIO_RW_NOIDLE))
#define SWRITE_SYNC (SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG | (1 << BIO_RW_UNPLUG))
#define WRITE_BARRIER (WRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_BARRIER))
#define WRITE_BARRIER (WRITE_SYNC | (1 << BIO_RW_BARRIER))
/*
* These aren't really reads or writes, they pass down information about