cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator, part 2
Since the patch "cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator", cpu_reg contains an error value if the regulator is not set, instead of NULL. Accordingly, fix the remaining check for non-NULL cpu_reg. Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Rafael J. Wysocki
parent
bb25f13aed
commit
43c638e3dd
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
|||||||
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
|
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
|
||||||
transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
|
transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (cpu_reg) {
|
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
|
||||||
struct opp *opp;
|
struct opp *opp;
|
||||||
unsigned long min_uV, max_uV;
|
unsigned long min_uV, max_uV;
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user