lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

reiserfs: rework reiserfs_warning

Browse Source 
ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent.
In some cases:
 * a unique identifier may be associated with it
 * the function name may be included
 * the device may be printed separately

This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints
the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function
name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically
inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have
a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them.
reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the
rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Mahoney
2009-03-30 14:02:21 -04:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 1d889d9958
commit 45b03d5e8e
17 changed files with 454 additions and 426 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

52
fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
View File

@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
unsigned int bmap_count = reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
if (block == 0 || block >= SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s)) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
"vs-4010: is_reusable: block number is out of range %lu (%u)",
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4010",
"block number is out of range %lu (%u)",
block, SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s));
return 0;
}
@@ -79,30 +79,29 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
b_blocknr_t bmap1 = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_sbh->b_blocknr + 1;
if (block >= bmap1 &&
block <= bmap1 + bmap_count) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4019: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4019", "bitmap block %lu(%u) "
"can't be freed or reused",
block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
} else {
if (offset == 0) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4020: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4020", "bitmap block %lu(%u) "
"can't be freed or reused",
block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
}
if (bmap >= bmap_count) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
"vs-4030: is_reusable: there is no so many bitmap blocks: "
"block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u", block, bmap);
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4030", "bitmap for requested block "
"is out of range: block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u",
block, bmap);
return 0;
}
if (bit_value == 0 && block == SB_ROOT_BLOCK(s)) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
"vs-4050: is_reusable: this is root block (%u), "
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4050", "this is root block (%u), "
"it must be busy", SB_ROOT_BLOCK(s));
return 0;
}
@@ -154,8 +153,8 @@ static int scan_bitmap_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
/* - I mean `a window of zero bits' as in description of this function - Zam. */
if (!bi) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "NULL bitmap info pointer for bitmap %d",
bmap_n);
reiserfs_warning(s, "jdm-4055", "NULL bitmap info pointer "
"for bitmap %d", bmap_n);
return 0;
}
@@ -400,11 +399,8 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
get_bit_address(s, block, &nr, &offset);
if (nr >= reiserfs_bmap_count(s)) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075: reiserfs_free_block: "
"block %lu is out of range on %s "
"(nr=%u,max=%u)", block,
reiserfs_bdevname(s), nr,
reiserfs_bmap_count(s));
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075", "block %lu is out of range",
block);
return;
}
@@ -416,9 +412,8 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
/* clear bit for the given block in bit map */
if (!reiserfs_test_and_clear_le_bit(offset, bmbh->b_data)) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: "
"free_block (%s:%lu)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared",
reiserfs_bdevname(s), block);
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4080",
"block %lu: bit already cleared", block);
}
apbi[nr].free_count++;
journal_mark_dirty(th, s, bmbh);
@@ -477,9 +472,8 @@ static void __discard_prealloc(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
BUG_ON(!th->t_trans_id);
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (ei->i_prealloc_count < 0)
reiserfs_warning(th->t_super,
"zam-4001:%s: inode has negative prealloc blocks count.",
__func__);
reiserfs_warning(th->t_super, "zam-4001",
"inode has negative prealloc blocks count.");
#endif
while (ei->i_prealloc_count > 0) {
reiserfs_free_prealloc_block(th, inode, ei->i_prealloc_block);
@@ -515,9 +509,9 @@ void reiserfs_discard_all_prealloc(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th)
i_prealloc_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (!ei->i_prealloc_count) {
reiserfs_warning(th->t_super,
"zam-4001:%s: inode is in prealloc list but has no preallocated blocks.",
__func__);
reiserfs_warning(th->t_super, "zam-4001",
"inode is in prealloc list but has "
"no preallocated blocks.");
}
#endif
__discard_prealloc(th, ei);
@@ -631,8 +625,8 @@ int reiserfs_parse_alloc_options(struct super_block *s, char *options)
continue;
}
reiserfs_warning(s, "zam-4001: %s : unknown option - %s",
__func__, this_char);
reiserfs_warning(s, "zam-4001", "unknown option - %s",
this_char);
return 1;
}