[PATCH] knfsd: Correctly handle error condition from lockd_up
If lockd_up fails - what should we expect? Do we have to later call lockd_down? Well the nfs client thinks "no", the nfs server thinks "yes". lockd thinks "yes". The only answer that really makes sense is "no" !! So: Make lockd_up only increment nlmsvc_users on success. Make nfsd handle errors from lockd_up properly. Make sure lockd_up(0) never fails when lockd is running so that the 'reclaimer' call to lockd_up doesn't need to be error checked. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
7dcf91ec66
commit
4a3ae42dc3
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ reclaimer(void *ptr)
|
||||
/* This one ensures that our parent doesn't terminate while the
|
||||
* reclaim is in progress */
|
||||
lock_kernel();
|
||||
lockd_up(0);
|
||||
lockd_up(0); /* note: this cannot fail as lockd is already running */
|
||||
|
||||
nlmclnt_prepare_reclaim(host);
|
||||
/* First, reclaim all locks that have been marked. */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user