xfs: fix stale inode flush avoidance
When reclaiming stale inodes, we need to guarantee that inodes are unpinned before returning with a "clean" status. If we don't we can reclaim inodes that are pinned, leading to use after free in the transaction subsystem as transactions complete. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2842,13 +2842,9 @@ xfs_iflush(
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode flush lock and
|
* If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode flush lock and
|
||||||
* do nothing. Treat stale inodes the same; we cannot rely on the
|
* do nothing.
|
||||||
* backing buffer remaining stale in cache for the remaining life of
|
|
||||||
* the stale inode and so xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that
|
|
||||||
* no longer contains inodes below. Doing this stale check here also
|
|
||||||
* avoids forcing the log on pinned, stale inodes.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip) || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
|
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
|
||||||
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
|
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@@ -2871,6 +2867,19 @@ xfs_iflush(
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
|
xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* For stale inodes we cannot rely on the backing buffer remaining
|
||||||
|
* stale in cache for the remaining life of the stale inode and so
|
||||||
|
* xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that no longer contains
|
||||||
|
* inodes below. We have to check this after ensuring the inode is
|
||||||
|
* unpinned so that it is safe to reclaim the stale inode after the
|
||||||
|
* flush call.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
|
||||||
|
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* This may have been unpinned because the filesystem is shutting
|
* This may have been unpinned because the filesystem is shutting
|
||||||
* down forcibly. If that's the case we must not write this inode
|
* down forcibly. If that's the case we must not write this inode
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user