[PATCH] mm: split page table lock
Christoph Lameter demonstrated very poor scalability on the SGI 512-way, with a many-threaded application which concurrently initializes different parts of a large anonymous area. This patch corrects that, by using a separate spinlock per page table page, to guard the page table entries in that page, instead of using the mm's single page_table_lock. (But even then, page_table_lock is still used to guard page table allocation, and anon_vma allocation.) In this implementation, the spinlock is tucked inside the struct page of the page table page: with a BUILD_BUG_ON in case it overflows - which it would in the case of 32-bit PA-RISC with spinlock debugging enabled. Splitting the lock is not quite for free: another cacheline access. Ideally, I suppose we would use split ptlock only for multi-threaded processes on multi-cpu machines; but deciding that dynamically would have its own costs. So for now enable it by config, at some number of cpus - since the Kconfig language doesn't support inequalities, let preprocessor compare that with NR_CPUS. But I don't think it's worth being user-configurable: for good testing of both split and unsplit configs, split now at 4 cpus, and perhaps change that to 8 later. There is a benefit even for singly threaded processes: kswapd can be attacking one part of the mm while another part is busy faulting. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
b38c6845b6
commit
4c21e2f244
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int __add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
|
||||
page_cache_get(page);
|
||||
SetPageLocked(page);
|
||||
SetPageSwapCache(page);
|
||||
page->private = entry.val;
|
||||
set_page_private(page, entry.val);
|
||||
total_swapcache_pages++;
|
||||
pagecache_acct(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct page *page)
|
||||
BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
|
||||
BUG_ON(PagePrivate(page));
|
||||
|
||||
radix_tree_delete(&swapper_space.page_tree, page->private);
|
||||
page->private = 0;
|
||||
radix_tree_delete(&swapper_space.page_tree, page_private(page));
|
||||
set_page_private(page, 0);
|
||||
ClearPageSwapCache(page);
|
||||
total_swapcache_pages--;
|
||||
pagecache_acct(-1);
|
||||
@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void delete_from_swap_cache(struct page *page)
|
||||
{
|
||||
swp_entry_t entry;
|
||||
|
||||
entry.val = page->private;
|
||||
entry.val = page_private(page);
|
||||
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
|
||||
__delete_from_swap_cache(page);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user