pcmcia: deprecate CS_SUCCESS
Instead of using own error or success codes, the PCMCIA code should rely on the generic return values. Therefore, replace all occurrences of CS_SUCCESS with 0. CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
This commit is contained in:
@ -431,10 +431,10 @@ first_tuple(struct pcmcia_device *handle, tuple_t * tuple, cisparse_t * parse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
i = pcmcia_get_first_tuple(handle, tuple);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS)
|
||||
if (i != 0)
|
||||
return CS_NO_MORE_ITEMS;
|
||||
i = pcmcia_get_tuple_data(handle, tuple);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS)
|
||||
if (i != 0)
|
||||
return i;
|
||||
return pcmcia_parse_tuple(handle, tuple, parse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int simple_config(struct pcmcia_device *link)
|
||||
|
||||
found_port:
|
||||
i = pcmcia_request_irq(link, &link->irq);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (i != 0) {
|
||||
cs_error(link, RequestIRQ, i);
|
||||
link->irq.AssignedIRQ = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ found_port:
|
||||
info->quirk->config(link);
|
||||
|
||||
i = pcmcia_request_configuration(link, &link->conf);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (i != 0) {
|
||||
cs_error(link, RequestConfiguration, i);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static int multi_config(struct pcmcia_device *link)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
i = pcmcia_request_irq(link, &link->irq);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (i != 0) {
|
||||
/* FIXME: comment does not fit, error handling does not fit */
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE
|
||||
"serial_cs: no usable port range found, giving up\n");
|
||||
@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int multi_config(struct pcmcia_device *link)
|
||||
info->quirk->config(link);
|
||||
|
||||
i = pcmcia_request_configuration(link, &link->conf);
|
||||
if (i != CS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (i != 0) {
|
||||
cs_error(link, RequestConfiguration, i);
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static int serial_config(struct pcmcia_device * link)
|
||||
/* Is this a compliant multifunction card? */
|
||||
tuple->DesiredTuple = CISTPL_LONGLINK_MFC;
|
||||
tuple->Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON | TUPLE_RETURN_LINK;
|
||||
info->multi = (first_tuple(link, tuple, parse) == CS_SUCCESS);
|
||||
info->multi = (first_tuple(link, tuple, parse) == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is this a multiport card? */
|
||||
tuple->DesiredTuple = CISTPL_MANFID;
|
||||
@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int serial_config(struct pcmcia_device * link)
|
||||
((link->func_id == CISTPL_FUNCID_MULTI) ||
|
||||
(link->func_id == CISTPL_FUNCID_SERIAL))) {
|
||||
tuple->DesiredTuple = CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY;
|
||||
if (first_tuple(link, tuple, parse) == CS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (first_tuple(link, tuple, parse) == 0) {
|
||||
if ((cf->io.nwin == 1) && (cf->io.win[0].len % 8 == 0))
|
||||
info->multi = cf->io.win[0].len >> 3;
|
||||
if ((cf->io.nwin == 2) && (cf->io.win[0].len == 8) &&
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user