[libata] ahci: SB600 workaround is suspect... play it safe for now
At least one report claims that a878539ef9
failed to solve lockups, whereas the old limit-to-32-bit trick worked.
Restore the 32-bit limit, but also leave the 255-sector limit in place,
because we know that's needed as well.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info ahci_port_info[] = {
|
|||||||
/* board_ahci_sb600 */
|
/* board_ahci_sb600 */
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_SERR_INTERNAL |
|
AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_SERR_INTERNAL |
|
||||||
|
AHCI_HFLAG_32BIT_ONLY |
|
||||||
AHCI_HFLAG_SECT255 | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_PMP),
|
AHCI_HFLAG_SECT255 | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_PMP),
|
||||||
.flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
|
.flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
|
||||||
.link_flags = AHCI_LFLAG_COMMON,
|
.link_flags = AHCI_LFLAG_COMMON,
|
||||||
@@ -1217,8 +1218,11 @@ static void ahci_dev_config(struct ata_device *dev)
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = dev->link->ap->host->private_data;
|
struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = dev->link->ap->host->private_data;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_SECT255)
|
if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_SECT255) {
|
||||||
dev->max_sectors = 255;
|
dev->max_sectors = 255;
|
||||||
|
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO,
|
||||||
|
"SB600 AHCI: limiting to 255 sectors per cmd\n");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static unsigned int ahci_dev_classify(struct ata_port *ap)
|
static unsigned int ahci_dev_classify(struct ata_port *ap)
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user