devcgroup: relax white-list protection down to RCU
Currently this list is protected with a simple spinlock, even for reading from one. This is OK, but can be better. Actually I want it to be better very much, since after replacing the OpenVZ device permissions engine with the cgroup-based one I noticed, that we set 12 default device permissions for each newly created container (for /dev/null, full, terminals, ect devices), and people sometimes have up to 20 perms more, so traversing the ~30-40 elements list under a spinlock doesn't seem very good. Here's the RCU protection for white-list - dev_whitelist_item-s are added and removed under the devcg->lock, but are looked up in permissions checking under the rcu_read_lock. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
e885dcde75
commit
4efd1a1b2f
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct dev_whitelist_item {
|
|||||||
short type;
|
short type;
|
||||||
short access;
|
short access;
|
||||||
struct list_head list;
|
struct list_head list;
|
||||||
|
struct rcu_head rcu;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct dev_cgroup {
|
struct dev_cgroup {
|
||||||
@@ -133,11 +134,19 @@ static int dev_whitelist_add(struct dev_cgroup *dev_cgroup,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (whcopy != NULL)
|
if (whcopy != NULL)
|
||||||
list_add_tail(&whcopy->list, &dev_cgroup->whitelist);
|
list_add_tail_rcu(&whcopy->list, &dev_cgroup->whitelist);
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void whitelist_item_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct dev_whitelist_item *item;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
item = container_of(rcu, struct dev_whitelist_item, rcu);
|
||||||
|
kfree(item);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* called under cgroup_lock()
|
* called under cgroup_lock()
|
||||||
* since the list is visible to other tasks, we need the spinlock also
|
* since the list is visible to other tasks, we need the spinlock also
|
||||||
@@ -161,8 +170,8 @@ static void dev_whitelist_rm(struct dev_cgroup *dev_cgroup,
|
|||||||
remove:
|
remove:
|
||||||
walk->access &= ~wh->access;
|
walk->access &= ~wh->access;
|
||||||
if (!walk->access) {
|
if (!walk->access) {
|
||||||
list_del(&walk->list);
|
list_del_rcu(&walk->list);
|
||||||
kfree(walk);
|
call_rcu(&walk->rcu, whitelist_item_free);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
||||||
@@ -269,15 +278,15 @@ static int devcgroup_seq_read(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cft,
|
|||||||
struct dev_whitelist_item *wh;
|
struct dev_whitelist_item *wh;
|
||||||
char maj[MAJMINLEN], min[MAJMINLEN], acc[ACCLEN];
|
char maj[MAJMINLEN], min[MAJMINLEN], acc[ACCLEN];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock(&devcgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry(wh, &devcgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
list_for_each_entry_rcu(wh, &devcgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
||||||
set_access(acc, wh->access);
|
set_access(acc, wh->access);
|
||||||
set_majmin(maj, wh->major);
|
set_majmin(maj, wh->major);
|
||||||
set_majmin(min, wh->minor);
|
set_majmin(min, wh->minor);
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, "%c %s:%s %s\n", type_to_char(wh->type),
|
seq_printf(m, "%c %s:%s %s\n", type_to_char(wh->type),
|
||||||
maj, min, acc);
|
maj, min, acc);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&devcgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@@ -510,8 +519,8 @@ int devcgroup_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
|
|||||||
if (!dev_cgroup)
|
if (!dev_cgroup)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
list_for_each_entry_rcu(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
||||||
if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
|
if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
|
||||||
goto acc_check;
|
goto acc_check;
|
||||||
if ((wh->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
|
if ((wh->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
|
||||||
@@ -527,10 +536,10 @@ acc_check:
|
|||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
if ((mask & MAY_READ) && !(wh->access & ACC_READ))
|
if ((mask & MAY_READ) && !(wh->access & ACC_READ))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return -EPERM;
|
return -EPERM;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@@ -545,7 +554,7 @@ int devcgroup_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev)
|
|||||||
if (!dev_cgroup)
|
if (!dev_cgroup)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
list_for_each_entry(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
|
||||||
if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
|
if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
|
||||||
goto acc_check;
|
goto acc_check;
|
||||||
@@ -560,9 +569,9 @@ int devcgroup_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev)
|
|||||||
acc_check:
|
acc_check:
|
||||||
if (!(wh->access & ACC_MKNOD))
|
if (!(wh->access & ACC_MKNOD))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dev_cgroup->lock);
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
return -EPERM;
|
return -EPERM;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user