ARM: clean up idle handlers
Let's factor out the need_resched() check instead of having it duplicated in every pm_idle implementations to avoid inconsistencies (omap2_pm_idle is missing it already). The forceful re-enablement of IRQs after pm_idle has returned can go. The warning certainly doesn't trigger for existing users. To get rid of the pm_idle calling convention oddity, let's introduce arm_pm_idle() allowing for the local_irq_enable() to be factored out from SOC specific implementations. The default pm_idle function becomes a wrapper for arm_pm_idle and it takes care of enabling IRQs closer to where they are initially disabled. And finally move the comment explaining the reason for that turning off of IRQs to a more proper location. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Acked-and-tested-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Nicolas Pitre
parent
3c0b2cef91
commit
4fa20439a8
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ extern void cpu_init(void);
|
||||
|
||||
void soft_restart(unsigned long);
|
||||
extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(char str, const char *cmd);
|
||||
extern void (*arm_pm_idle)(void);
|
||||
|
||||
#define UDBG_UNDEFINED (1 << 0)
|
||||
#define UDBG_SYSCALL (1 << 1)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user