[TCP]: Keep copied_seq, rcv_wup and rcv_next together.
I noticed in oprofile study a cache miss in tcp_rcv_established() to read copied_seq. ffffffff80400a80 <tcp_rcv_established>: /* tcp_rcv_established total: 4034293 2.0400 */ 55493 0.0281 :ffffffff80400bc9: mov 0x4c8(%r12),%eax copied_seq 543103 0.2746 :ffffffff80400bd1: cmp 0x3e0(%r12),%eax rcv_nxt if (tp->copied_seq == tp->rcv_nxt && len - tcp_header_len <= tp->ucopy.len) { In this function, the cache line 0x4c0 -> 0x500 is used only for this reading 'copied_seq' field. rcv_wup and copied_seq should be next to rcv_nxt field, to lower number of active cache lines in hot paths. (tcp_rcv_established(), tcp_poll(), ...) As you suggested, I changed tcp_create_openreq_child() so that these fields are changed together, to avoid adding a new store buffer stall. Patch is 64bit friendly (no new hole because of alignment constraints) Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
cf4c6bf83d
commit
54287cc178
@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
|
||||
* See RFC793 and RFC1122. The RFC writes these in capitals.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
u32 rcv_nxt; /* What we want to receive next */
|
||||
u32 copied_seq; /* Head of yet unread data */
|
||||
u32 rcv_wup; /* rcv_nxt on last window update sent */
|
||||
u32 snd_nxt; /* Next sequence we send */
|
||||
|
||||
u32 snd_una; /* First byte we want an ack for */
|
||||
@ -307,10 +309,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
|
||||
struct sk_buff_head out_of_order_queue; /* Out of order segments go here */
|
||||
|
||||
u32 rcv_wnd; /* Current receiver window */
|
||||
u32 rcv_wup; /* rcv_nxt on last window update sent */
|
||||
u32 write_seq; /* Tail(+1) of data held in tcp send buffer */
|
||||
u32 pushed_seq; /* Last pushed seq, required to talk to windows */
|
||||
u32 copied_seq; /* Head of yet unread data */
|
||||
|
||||
/* SACKs data */
|
||||
struct tcp_sack_block duplicate_sack[1]; /* D-SACK block */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user