[TCP]: Fix inconsistency of terms.
Fix inconsistency of terms: 1) D-SACK 2) F-RTO Signed-off-by: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
4bc3e17cce
commit
564262c1f0
@@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ tcp_frto - INTEGER
|
||||
F-RTO is an enhanced recovery algorithm for TCP retransmission
|
||||
timeouts. It is particularly beneficial in wireless environments
|
||||
where packet loss is typically due to random radio interference
|
||||
rather than intermediate router congestion. FRTO is sender-side
|
||||
rather than intermediate router congestion. F-RTO is sender-side
|
||||
only modification. Therefore it does not require any support from
|
||||
the peer, but in a typical case, however, where wireless link is
|
||||
the local access link and most of the data flows downlink, the
|
||||
faraway servers should have FRTO enabled to take advantage of it.
|
||||
faraway servers should have F-RTO enabled to take advantage of it.
|
||||
If set to 1, basic version is enabled. 2 enables SACK enhanced
|
||||
F-RTO if flow uses SACK. The basic version can be used also when
|
||||
SACK is in use though scenario(s) with it exists where FRTO
|
||||
SACK is in use though scenario(s) with it exists where F-RTO
|
||||
interacts badly with the packet counting of the SACK enabled TCP
|
||||
flow.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user