x86: rename PTE_MASK to PTE_PFN_MASK

Rusty, in his peevish way, complained that macros defining constants
should have a name which somewhat accurately reflects the actual
purpose of the constant.

Aside from the fact that PTE_MASK gives no clue as to what's actually
being masked, and is misleadingly similar to the functionally entirely
different PMD_MASK, PUD_MASK and PGD_MASK, I don't really see what the
problem is.

But if this patch silences the incessent noise, then it will have
achieved its goal (TODO: write test-case).

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-21 22:59:42 -07:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent c2e3277f87
commit 59438c9fc4
10 changed files with 28 additions and 28 deletions

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
_PAGE_DIRTY)
/* Set of bits not changed in pte_modify */
#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_MASK | _PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT | \
#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_PFN_MASK | _PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT | \
_PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
#define _PAGE_CACHE_MASK (_PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT)
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static inline pgprot_t pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, pgprot_t newprot)
return __pgprot(preservebits | addbits);
}
#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_flags(x) & ~PTE_MASK)
#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_flags(x) & ~PTE_PFN_MASK)
#define canon_pgprot(p) __pgprot(pgprot_val(p) & __supported_pte_mask)