lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Use WARN() in lib/

Browse Source 
Use WARN() instead of a printk+WARN_ON() pair; this way the message becomes
part of the warning section for better reporting/collection.  In addition, one
of the if() clauses collapes into the WARN() entirely now.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-25 19:45:39 -07:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent f810a5cf28
commit 5cd2b459d3
4 changed files with 15 additions and 22 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
lib/plist.c
View File

@ -31,12 +31,13 @@
static void plist_check_prev_next(struct list_head *t, struct list_head *p,
struct list_head *n)
{
if (n->prev != p || p->next != n) {
printk("top: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n", t, t->next, t->prev);
printk("prev: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n", p, p->next, p->prev);
printk("next: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n", n, n->next, n->prev);
WARN_ON(1);
}
WARN(n->prev != p || p->next != n,
"top: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n"
"prev: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n"
"next: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n",
t, t->next, t->prev,
p, p->next, p->prev,
n, n->next, n->prev);
}
static void plist_check_list(struct list_head *top)