[DCCP]: Finish the TIMEWAIT minisock support

Using most of the infrastructure TCP uses, with a dccp_death_row,
etc. As per my current interpretation of the draft what we have with
this changeset seems to be all we need (or very close to it 8)).

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-08-09 20:45:21 -07:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent 696ab2d3bf
commit 64cf1e5d8b
3 changed files with 63 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int __dccp_v4_check_established(struct sock *sk, const __u16 lport,
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITRECYCLED);
} else if (tw != NULL) {
/* Silly. Should hash-dance instead... */
dccp_tw_deschedule(tw);
inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &dccp_death_row);
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITRECYCLED);
inet_twsk_put(tw);
@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ ok:
spin_unlock(&head->lock);
if (tw != NULL) {
dccp_tw_deschedule(tw);
inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &dccp_death_row);
inet_twsk_put(tw);
}
@ -1131,8 +1131,9 @@ int dccp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT) {
dccp_pr_debug("sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT: discard_and_relse\n");
goto discard_and_relse;
dccp_pr_debug("sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT: "
"do_time_wait\n");
goto do_time_wait;
}
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) {
@ -1179,6 +1180,10 @@ discard_it:
discard_and_relse:
sock_put(sk);
goto discard_it;
do_time_wait:
inet_twsk_put((struct inet_timewait_sock *)sk);
goto no_dccp_socket;
}
static int dccp_v4_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
@ -1290,5 +1295,5 @@ struct proto dccp_v4_prot = {
.max_header = MAX_DCCP_HEADER,
.obj_size = sizeof(struct dccp_sock),
.rsk_prot = &dccp_request_sock_ops,
.twsk_obj_size = sizeof(struct inet_timewait_sock), /* FIXME! create dccp_timewait_sock */
.twsk_obj_size = sizeof(struct inet_timewait_sock),
};