lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

push BKL down into ->put_super

Browse Source 
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.

[AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
now]
[AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-05 15:40:36 +02:00
committed by Al Viro
parent a9e220f832
commit 6cfd014842
33 changed files with 133 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
fs/hpfs/super.c
View File

@@ -99,11 +99,16 @@ int hpfs_stop_cycles(struct super_block *s, int key, int *c1, int *c2,
static void hpfs_put_super(struct super_block *s)
{
struct hpfs_sb_info *sbi = hpfs_sb(s);
lock_kernel();
kfree(sbi->sb_cp_table);
kfree(sbi->sb_bmp_dir);
unmark_dirty(s);
s->s_fs_info = NULL;
kfree(sbi);
unlock_kernel();
}
unsigned hpfs_count_one_bitmap(struct super_block *s, secno secno)