lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

push BKL down into ->put_super

Browse Source 
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.

[AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
now]
[AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-05 15:40:36 +02:00
committed by Al Viro
parent a9e220f832
commit 6cfd014842
33 changed files with 133 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
fs/ufs/super.c
View File

@@ -594,6 +594,9 @@ static void ufs_put_super_internal(struct super_block *sb)
UFSD("ENTER\n");
lock_kernel();
ufs_put_cstotal(sb);
size = uspi->s_cssize;
blks = (size + uspi->s_fsize - 1) >> uspi->s_fshift;
@@ -621,6 +624,9 @@ static void ufs_put_super_internal(struct super_block *sb)
brelse (sbi->s_ucg[i]);
kfree (sbi->s_ucg);
kfree (base);
unlock_kernel();
UFSD("EXIT\n");
}