locks: make posix_test_lock() interface more consistent

Since posix_test_lock(), like fcntl() and ->lock(), indicates absence or
presence of a conflict lock by setting fl_type to, respectively, F_UNLCK
or something other than F_UNLCK, the return value is no longer needed.

Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This commit is contained in:
J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-11 16:09:32 -04:00
parent 370f6599e8
commit 6d34ac199a
3 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int locks_block_on_timeout(struct file_lock *blocker, struct file_lock *w
return result;
}
int
void
posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
{
struct file_lock *cfl;
@@ -671,14 +671,12 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
if (posix_locks_conflict(cfl, fl))
break;
}
if (cfl) {
if (cfl)
__locks_copy_lock(fl, cfl);
unlock_kernel();
return 1;
} else
else
fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
unlock_kernel();
return 0;
return;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(posix_test_lock);