locks: make posix_test_lock() interface more consistent
Since posix_test_lock(), like fcntl() and ->lock(), indicates absence or presence of a conflict lock by setting fl_type to, respectively, F_UNLCK or something other than F_UNLCK, the return value is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ extern void locks_init_lock(struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern void locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern void locks_remove_posix(struct file *, fl_owner_t);
|
||||
extern void locks_remove_flock(struct file *);
|
||||
extern int posix_test_lock(struct file *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern void posix_test_lock(struct file *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern int posix_lock_file(struct file *, struct file_lock *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern int posix_lock_file_wait(struct file *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern int posix_unblock_lock(struct file *, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user