mtd: Use BLOCK_NIL consistently in NFTL/INFTL

Use BLOCK_NIL consistently rather than sometimes 0xffff and sometimes
BLOCK_NIL.

The semantic patch that finds this issue is below
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/).  On the other hand, the changes
were made by hand, in part because drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c contains dead
code that causes spatch to ignore a relevant function.  Specifically, the
function INFTL_findwriteunit contains a do-while loop, but always takes a
return that leaves the loop on the first iteration.

// <smpl>
@r exists@
identifier f,C;
@@

f(...) { ... return C; }

@s@
identifier r.C;
expression E;
@@

@@
identifier r.f,r.C,I;
expression s.E;
@@

f(...) {
 <...
(
  I
|
- E
+ C
)
 ...>
}

// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Julia Lawall
2009-06-27 09:55:32 +02:00
committed by David Woodhouse
parent 89bb871e96
commit 70ec3bb8ea
2 changed files with 14 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
/* Normally, we force a fold to happen before we run out of free blocks completely */
if (!desperate && nftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "NFTL_findfreeblock: there are too few free EUNs\n");
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Scan for a free block */
@@ -230,11 +230,11 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
printk("Argh! No free blocks found! LastFreeEUN = %d, "
"FirstEUN = %d\n", nftl->LastFreeEUN,
le16_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FirstPhysicalEUN));
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
} while (pot != nftl->LastFreeEUN);
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned pendingblock )
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned p
/* add the header so that it is now a valid chain */
oob.u.a.VirtUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareVirtUnitNum = cpu_to_le16(thisVUC);
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = 0xffff;
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = BLOCK_NIL;
nftl_write_oob(mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) + 8,
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_makefreeblock( struct NFTLrecord *nftl , unsigned pendingblock)
if (ChainLength < 2) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "No Virtual Unit Chains available for folding. "
"Failing request\n");
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
return NFTL_foldchain (nftl, LongestChain, pendingblock);
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
printk(KERN_WARNING
"Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
thisVUC);
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Skip to next block in chain */
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
//u16 startEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
//printk("Write to VirtualUnitChain %d, calling makefreeblock()\n", thisVUC);
writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, 0xffff);
writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, BLOCK_NIL);
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* OK, we accept that the above comment is
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Error folding to make room for Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
thisVUC);
return 0xffff;
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
static int nftl_writeblock(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *mbd, unsigned long block,