mtd: Use BLOCK_NIL consistently in NFTL/INFTL
Use BLOCK_NIL consistently rather than sometimes 0xffff and sometimes BLOCK_NIL. The semantic patch that finds this issue is below (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/). On the other hand, the changes were made by hand, in part because drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c contains dead code that causes spatch to ignore a relevant function. Specifically, the function INFTL_findwriteunit contains a do-while loop, but always takes a return that leaves the loop on the first iteration. // <smpl> @r exists@ identifier f,C; @@ f(...) { ... return C; } @s@ identifier r.C; expression E; @@ @@ identifier r.f,r.C,I; expression s.E; @@ f(...) { <... ( I | - E + C ) ...> } // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David Woodhouse
parent
89bb871e96
commit
70ec3bb8ea
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
|
||||
/* Normally, we force a fold to happen before we run out of free blocks completely */
|
||||
if (!desperate && nftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
|
||||
DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "NFTL_findfreeblock: there are too few free EUNs\n");
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Scan for a free block */
|
||||
@@ -230,11 +230,11 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
|
||||
printk("Argh! No free blocks found! LastFreeEUN = %d, "
|
||||
"FirstEUN = %d\n", nftl->LastFreeEUN,
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FirstPhysicalEUN));
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (pot != nftl->LastFreeEUN);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned pendingblock )
|
||||
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned p
|
||||
|
||||
/* add the header so that it is now a valid chain */
|
||||
oob.u.a.VirtUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareVirtUnitNum = cpu_to_le16(thisVUC);
|
||||
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = 0xffff;
|
||||
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
|
||||
nftl_write_oob(mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) + 8,
|
||||
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
|
||||
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_makefreeblock( struct NFTLrecord *nftl , unsigned pendingblock)
|
||||
if (ChainLength < 2) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "No Virtual Unit Chains available for folding. "
|
||||
"Failing request\n");
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NFTL_foldchain (nftl, LongestChain, pendingblock);
|
||||
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING
|
||||
"Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
|
||||
thisVUC);
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip to next block in chain */
|
||||
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
|
||||
//u16 startEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
|
||||
|
||||
//printk("Write to VirtualUnitChain %d, calling makefreeblock()\n", thisVUC);
|
||||
writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, 0xffff);
|
||||
writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, BLOCK_NIL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
|
||||
/* OK, we accept that the above comment is
|
||||
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
|
||||
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "Error folding to make room for Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
|
||||
thisVUC);
|
||||
return 0xffff;
|
||||
return BLOCK_NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int nftl_writeblock(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *mbd, unsigned long block,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user