lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'for-2.6.38' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu

Browse Source 
* 'for-2.6.38' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu: (30 commits)
  gameport: use this_cpu_read instead of lookup
  x86: udelay: Use this_cpu_read to avoid address calculation
  x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter
  x86: Replace uses of current_cpu_data with this_cpu ops
  x86: Use this_cpu_ops to optimize code
  vmstat: User per cpu atomics to avoid interrupt disable / enable
  irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics
  cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics
  x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_xchg operations
  percpu: Generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_xchg support
  percpu,x86: relocate this_cpu_add_return() and friends
  connector: Use this_cpu operations
  xen: Use this_cpu_inc_return
  taskstats: Use this_cpu_ops
  random: Use this_cpu_inc_return
  fs: Use this_cpu_inc_return in buffer.c
  highmem: Use this_cpu_xx_return() operations
  vmstat: Use this_cpu_inc_return for vm statistics
  x86: Support for this_cpu_add, sub, dec, inc_return
  percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add, sub, dec, inc_return
  ...

Fixed up conflicts: in arch/x86/kernel/{apic/nmi.c, apic/x2apic_uv_x.c, process.c}
as per Tejun.
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds
2011-01-07 17:02:58 -08:00
parent 23d69b09b7 55ee4ef302
commit 72eb6a7914
62 changed files with 703 additions and 275 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
View File

@@ -997,8 +997,7 @@ x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
static void x86_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
if (cpuc->enabled)
if (__this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.enabled))
__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw,
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
}
@@ -1272,7 +1271,7 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
break;
case DIE_NMIUNKNOWN:
this_nmi = percpu_read(irq_stat.__nmi_count);
if (this_nmi != __get_cpu_var(pmu_nmi).marked)
if (this_nmi != __this_cpu_read(pmu_nmi.marked))
/* let the kernel handle the unknown nmi */
return NOTIFY_DONE;
/*
@@ -1296,8 +1295,8 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
this_nmi = percpu_read(irq_stat.__nmi_count);
if ((handled > 1) ||
/* the next nmi could be a back-to-back nmi */
((__get_cpu_var(pmu_nmi).marked == this_nmi) &&
(__get_cpu_var(pmu_nmi).handled > 1))) {
((__this_cpu_read(pmu_nmi.marked) == this_nmi) &&
(__this_cpu_read(pmu_nmi.handled) > 1))) {
/*
* We could have two subsequent back-to-back nmis: The
* first handles more than one counter, the 2nd
@@ -1308,8 +1307,8 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
* handling more than one counter. We will mark the
* next (3rd) and then drop it if unhandled.
*/
__get_cpu_var(pmu_nmi).marked = this_nmi + 1;
__get_cpu_var(pmu_nmi).handled = handled;
__this_cpu_write(pmu_nmi.marked, this_nmi + 1);
__this_cpu_write(pmu_nmi.handled, handled);
}
return NOTIFY_STOP;
@@ -1484,11 +1483,9 @@ static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
*/
static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
cpuc->group_flag |= PERF_EVENT_TXN;
cpuc->n_txn = 0;
__this_cpu_or(cpu_hw_events.group_flag, PERF_EVENT_TXN);
__this_cpu_write(cpu_hw_events.n_txn, 0);
}
/*
@@ -1498,14 +1495,12 @@ static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
*/
static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
cpuc->group_flag &= ~PERF_EVENT_TXN;
__this_cpu_and(cpu_hw_events.group_flag, ~PERF_EVENT_TXN);
/*
* Truncate the collected events.
*/
cpuc->n_added -= cpuc->n_txn;
cpuc->n_events -= cpuc->n_txn;
__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_added, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_events, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
}