x86: handle PAT more like other CPU features
Impact: Cleanup When PAT was originally introduced, it was handled specially for a few reasons: - PAT bugs are hard to track down, so we wanted to maintain a whitelist of CPUs. - The i386 and x86-64 CPUID code was not yet unified. Both of these are now obsolete, so handle PAT like any other features, including ordinary feature blacklisting due to known bugs. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,10 +5,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAT
|
||||
extern int pat_enabled;
|
||||
extern void validate_pat_support(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static const int pat_enabled;
|
||||
static inline void validate_pat_support(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { }
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
extern void pat_init(void);
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +15,4 @@ extern int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end,
|
||||
unsigned long req_type, unsigned long *ret_type);
|
||||
extern int free_memtype(u64 start, u64 end);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void pat_disable(char *reason);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PAT_H */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user