[NET]: Kill skb->list
Remove the "list" member of struct sk_buff, as it is entirely redundant. All SKB list removal callers know which list the SKB is on, so storing this in sk_buff does nothing other than taking up some space. Two tricky bits were SCTP, which I took care of, and two ATM drivers which Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> fixed up. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
6869c4d8e0
commit
8728b834b2
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int tcp_fragment(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 len, unsigned
|
||||
|
||||
/* Link BUFF into the send queue. */
|
||||
skb_header_release(buff);
|
||||
__skb_append(skb, buff);
|
||||
__skb_append(skb, buff, &sk->sk_write_queue);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ static int tso_fragment(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Link BUFF into the send queue. */
|
||||
skb_header_release(buff);
|
||||
__skb_append(skb, buff);
|
||||
__skb_append(skb, buff, &sk->sk_write_queue);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1238,7 +1238,7 @@ static void tcp_retrans_try_collapse(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int m
|
||||
tcp_skb_pcount(next_skb) != 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ok. We will be able to collapse the packet. */
|
||||
__skb_unlink(next_skb, next_skb->list);
|
||||
__skb_unlink(next_skb, &sk->sk_write_queue);
|
||||
|
||||
memcpy(skb_put(skb, next_skb_size), next_skb->data, next_skb_size);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user