x86, mm: is_untracked_pat_range() takes a normal semiclosed range

is_untracked_pat_range() -- like its components, is_ISA_range() and
is_GRU_range(), takes a normal semiclosed interval (>=, <) whereas the
PAT code called it as if it took a closed range (>=, <=).  Fix.

Although this is a bug, I believe it is non-manifest, simply because
none of the callers will call this with non-page-aligned addresses.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>
This commit is contained in:
H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-23 14:49:20 -08:00
parent 55a6ca2547
commit 8a27138924
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static inline int is_new_memtype_allowed(u64 paddr, unsigned long size,
/*
* PAT type is always WB for untracked ranges, so no need to check.
*/
if (x86_platform.is_untracked_pat_range(paddr, paddr + size - 1))
if (x86_platform.is_untracked_pat_range(paddr, paddr + size))
return 1;
/*