Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion

Commit 1faa16d228 accidentally broke
the bdi congestion wait queue logic, causing us to wait on congestion
for WRITE (== 1) when we really wanted BLK_RW_ASYNC (== 0) instead.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jens Axboe
2009-07-09 14:52:32 +02:00
committed by Jens Axboe
parent c2cc49a2f8
commit 8aa7e847d8
16 changed files with 43 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
break; /* We've done our duty */
congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
}
if (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback < bdi_thresh &&
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask)
if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
break;
congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
/*
* The caller might hold locks which can prevent IO completion
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages)
if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0 || wbc.pages_skipped > 0) {
/* Wrote less than expected */
if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
else
break;
}
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg)
writeback_inodes(&wbc);
if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) {
if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
else
break; /* All the old data is written */
}