lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

sysctl: remove "struct file *" argument of ->proc_handler

Browse Source 
It's unused.

It isn't needed -- read or write flag is already passed and sysctl
shouldn't care about the rest.

It _was_ used in two places at arch/frv for some reason.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alexey Dobriyan
2009-09-23 15:57:19 -07:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent c0d0787b6d
commit 8d65af789f
60 changed files with 239 additions and 270 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
View File

@@ -42,14 +42,14 @@ static void put_uts(ctl_table *table, int write, void *which)
* Special case of dostring for the UTS structure. This has locks
* to observe. Should this be in kernel/sys.c ????
*/
static int proc_do_uts_string(ctl_table *table, int write, struct file *filp,
static int proc_do_uts_string(ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct ctl_table uts_table;
int r;
memcpy(&uts_table, table, sizeof(uts_table));
uts_table.data = get_uts(table, write);
r = proc_dostring(&uts_table,write,filp,buffer,lenp, ppos);
r = proc_dostring(&uts_table,write,buffer,lenp, ppos);
put_uts(table, write, uts_table.data);
return r;
}