f2fs: avoid writing inode redundantly when creating a file
In f2fs_write_inode, updating inode after f2fs_balance_fs is not a optimized way in the case that f2fs_gc is performed ahead. The inode page will be unnecessarily written out twice, one of which is in f2fs_gc->...->sync_node_pages and the other is in update_inode_page. Let's update the inode page in prior to f2fs_balance_fs to avoid this. To reproduce it, $ touch file (before this step, should make the device need f2fs_gc) $ sync (or wait the bdi to write dirty inode) Signed-off-by: Jin Xu <jinuxstyle@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -221,9 +221,6 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|||||||
if (!is_inode_flag_set(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DIRTY_INODE))
|
if (!is_inode_flag_set(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DIRTY_INODE))
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (wbc)
|
|
||||||
f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* We need to lock here to prevent from producing dirty node pages
|
* We need to lock here to prevent from producing dirty node pages
|
||||||
* during the urgent cleaning time when runing out of free sections.
|
* during the urgent cleaning time when runing out of free sections.
|
||||||
@@ -231,6 +228,10 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|||||||
ilock = mutex_lock_op(sbi);
|
ilock = mutex_lock_op(sbi);
|
||||||
ret = update_inode_page(inode);
|
ret = update_inode_page(inode);
|
||||||
mutex_unlock_op(sbi, ilock);
|
mutex_unlock_op(sbi, ilock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (wbc)
|
||||||
|
f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return ret;
|
return ret;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user