percpu: Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants
We simply say that regular this_cpu use must be safe regardless of preemption and interrupt state. That has no material change for x86 and s390 implementations of this_cpu operations. However, arches that do not provide their own implementation for this_cpu operations will now get code generated that disables interrupts instead of preemption. -tj: This is part of on-going percpu API cleanup. For detailed discussion of the subject, please refer to the following thread. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1222078 Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112221154380.11787@router.home>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Tejun Heo
parent
ecefc36b41
commit
933393f58f
@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, xt_recseq);
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Begin packet processing : all readers must wait the end
|
||||
* 1) Must be called with preemption disabled
|
||||
* 2) softirqs must be disabled too (or we should use irqsafe_cpu_add())
|
||||
* 2) softirqs must be disabled too (or we should use this_cpu_add())
|
||||
* Returns :
|
||||
* 1 if no recursion on this cpu
|
||||
* 0 if recursion detected
|
||||
@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xt_write_recseq_begin(void)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* End packet processing : all readers can proceed
|
||||
* 1) Must be called with preemption disabled
|
||||
* 2) softirqs must be disabled too (or we should use irqsafe_cpu_add())
|
||||
* 2) softirqs must be disabled too (or we should use this_cpu_add())
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void xt_write_recseq_end(unsigned int addend)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user