[PATCH] x86-64/i386: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes
Fields obtained through cpuid vector 0x1(ebx[16:23]) and vector 0x4(eax[14:25], eax[26:31]) indicate the maximum values and might not always be the same as what is available and what OS sees. So make sure "siblings" and "cpu cores" values in /proc/cpuinfo reflect the values as seen by OS instead of what cpuid instruction says. This will also fix the buggy BIOS cases (for example where cpuid on a single core cpu says there are "2" siblings, even when HT is disabled in the BIOS. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4359) Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
e90f22edf4
commit
94605eff57
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ void __devinit identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
|
||||
c->x86_model = c->x86_mask = 0; /* So far unknown... */
|
||||
c->x86_vendor_id[0] = '\0'; /* Unset */
|
||||
c->x86_model_id[0] = '\0'; /* Unset */
|
||||
c->x86_num_cores = 1;
|
||||
c->x86_max_cores = 1;
|
||||
memset(&c->x86_capability, 0, sizeof c->x86_capability);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!have_cpuid_p()) {
|
||||
@@ -446,52 +446,44 @@ void __devinit identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
|
||||
void __devinit detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
|
||||
int index_msb, tmp;
|
||||
int index_msb, core_bits;
|
||||
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
||||
|
||||
cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
|
||||
|
||||
c->apicid = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HT) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CMP_LEGACY))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
|
||||
smp_num_siblings = (ebx & 0xff0000) >> 16;
|
||||
|
||||
if (smp_num_siblings == 1) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled\n");
|
||||
} else if (smp_num_siblings > 1 ) {
|
||||
index_msb = 31;
|
||||
|
||||
if (smp_num_siblings > NR_CPUS) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "CPU: Unsupported number of the siblings %d", smp_num_siblings);
|
||||
smp_num_siblings = 1;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
tmp = smp_num_siblings;
|
||||
while ((tmp & 0x80000000 ) == 0) {
|
||||
tmp <<=1 ;
|
||||
index_msb--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (smp_num_siblings & (smp_num_siblings - 1))
|
||||
index_msb++;
|
||||
|
||||
index_msb = get_count_order(smp_num_siblings);
|
||||
phys_proc_id[cpu] = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb);
|
||||
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
|
||||
phys_proc_id[cpu]);
|
||||
|
||||
smp_num_siblings = smp_num_siblings / c->x86_num_cores;
|
||||
smp_num_siblings = smp_num_siblings / c->x86_max_cores;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp = smp_num_siblings;
|
||||
index_msb = 31;
|
||||
while ((tmp & 0x80000000) == 0) {
|
||||
tmp <<=1 ;
|
||||
index_msb--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
index_msb = get_count_order(smp_num_siblings) ;
|
||||
|
||||
if (smp_num_siblings & (smp_num_siblings - 1))
|
||||
index_msb++;
|
||||
core_bits = get_count_order(c->x86_max_cores);
|
||||
|
||||
cpu_core_id[cpu] = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb);
|
||||
cpu_core_id[cpu] = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb) &
|
||||
((1 << core_bits) - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (c->x86_num_cores > 1)
|
||||
if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
|
||||
cpu_core_id[cpu]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user