[IA64] On return from syscall, hint b7 with __kernel_syscall_via_epc().
Why is this a good idea? Clearing b7 to 0 is guaranteed to do us no good and writing it with __kernel_syscall_via_epc() yields a 6 cycle improvement _if_ the application performs another EPC-based system- call without overwriting b7, which is not all that uncommon. Well worth the minimal cost of 1 bundle of code. Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Tony Luck
parent
3c79c8b1d9
commit
96e017495e
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ ENTRY(ia64_leave_syscall)
|
|||||||
;;
|
;;
|
||||||
(p6) ld4 r31=[r18] // load current_thread_info()->flags
|
(p6) ld4 r31=[r18] // load current_thread_info()->flags
|
||||||
ld8 r19=[r2],PT(B6)-PT(LOADRS) // load ar.rsc value for "loadrs"
|
ld8 r19=[r2],PT(B6)-PT(LOADRS) // load ar.rsc value for "loadrs"
|
||||||
mov b7=r0 // clear b7
|
nop.i 0
|
||||||
;;
|
;;
|
||||||
ld8 r23=[r3],PT(R11)-PT(AR_BSPSTORE) // load ar.bspstore (may be garbage)
|
ld8 r23=[r3],PT(R11)-PT(AR_BSPSTORE) // load ar.bspstore (may be garbage)
|
||||||
ld8 r18=[r2],PT(R9)-PT(B6) // load b6
|
ld8 r18=[r2],PT(R9)-PT(B6) // load b6
|
||||||
@@ -754,7 +754,14 @@ ENTRY(ia64_leave_syscall)
|
|||||||
(pUStk) ld4 r17=[r3] // r17 = cpu_data->phys_stacked_size_p8
|
(pUStk) ld4 r17=[r3] // r17 = cpu_data->phys_stacked_size_p8
|
||||||
mov.m ar.csd=r0 // M2 clear ar.csd
|
mov.m ar.csd=r0 // M2 clear ar.csd
|
||||||
mov f10=f0 // clear f10
|
mov f10=f0 // clear f10
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nop.m 0
|
||||||
|
movl r14=__kernel_syscall_via_epc // X
|
||||||
;;
|
;;
|
||||||
|
nop.m 0
|
||||||
|
nop.m 0
|
||||||
|
mov b7=r14 // I0 clear b7 (hint with __kernel_syscall_via_epc)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mov r14=r0 // clear r14
|
mov r14=r0 // clear r14
|
||||||
mov f11=f0 // clear f11
|
mov f11=f0 // clear f11
|
||||||
(pKStk) br.cond.dpnt.many skip_rbs_switch
|
(pKStk) br.cond.dpnt.many skip_rbs_switch
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user