signals: move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct

Oleg Nesterov pointed out we have to prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec
itself and we can reuse ->cred_guard_mutex for it.  Yes, concurrent
execve() has no worth.

Let's move ->cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct.  It
naturally prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-10-27 15:34:08 -07:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent b840115083
commit 9b1bf12d5d
8 changed files with 21 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_creds);
/*
* Prepare credentials for current to perform an execve()
* - The caller must hold current->cred_guard_mutex
* - The caller must hold ->cred_guard_mutex
*/
struct cred *prepare_exec_creds(void)
{
@@ -384,8 +384,6 @@ int copy_creds(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
struct cred *new;
int ret;
mutex_init(&p->cred_guard_mutex);
if (
#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
!p->cred->thread_keyring &&