[PATCH] ohci1394, sbp2: fix "scsi_add_device failed" with PL-3507 based devices
Re-enable posted writes for status FIFO. Besides bringing back a very minor bandwidth tweak from Linux 2.6.15.x and older, this also fixes an interoperability regression since 2.6.16: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6356 (sbp2: scsi_add_device failed. IEEE1394 HD is not working anymore.) Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Tested-by: Vanei Heidemann <linux@javanei.com.br> Tested-by: Martin Putzlocher <mputzi@gmx.de> (chip type unconfirmed) Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
679c0cd2dd
commit
a54c9d30db
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void ohci_initialize(struct ti_ohci *ohci)
|
|||||||
* register content.
|
* register content.
|
||||||
* To actually enable physical responses is the job of our interrupt
|
* To actually enable physical responses is the job of our interrupt
|
||||||
* handler which programs the physical request filter. */
|
* handler which programs the physical request filter. */
|
||||||
reg_write(ohci, OHCI1394_PhyUpperBound, 0xffff0000);
|
reg_write(ohci, OHCI1394_PhyUpperBound, 0x01000000);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
DBGMSG("physUpperBoundOffset=%08x",
|
DBGMSG("physUpperBoundOffset=%08x",
|
||||||
reg_read(ohci, OHCI1394_PhyUpperBound));
|
reg_read(ohci, OHCI1394_PhyUpperBound));
|
||||||
|
@@ -835,11 +835,16 @@ static struct scsi_id_instance_data *sbp2_alloc_device(struct unit_directory *ud
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Register the status FIFO address range. We could use the same FIFO
|
/* Register the status FIFO address range. We could use the same FIFO
|
||||||
* for targets at different nodes. However we need different FIFOs per
|
* for targets at different nodes. However we need different FIFOs per
|
||||||
* target in order to support multi-unit devices. */
|
* target in order to support multi-unit devices.
|
||||||
|
* The FIFO is located out of the local host controller's physical range
|
||||||
|
* but, if possible, within the posted write area. Status writes will
|
||||||
|
* then be performed as unified transactions. This slightly reduces
|
||||||
|
* bandwidth usage, and some Prolific based devices seem to require it.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
scsi_id->status_fifo_addr = hpsb_allocate_and_register_addrspace(
|
scsi_id->status_fifo_addr = hpsb_allocate_and_register_addrspace(
|
||||||
&sbp2_highlevel, ud->ne->host, &sbp2_ops,
|
&sbp2_highlevel, ud->ne->host, &sbp2_ops,
|
||||||
sizeof(struct sbp2_status_block), sizeof(quadlet_t),
|
sizeof(struct sbp2_status_block), sizeof(quadlet_t),
|
||||||
~0ULL, ~0ULL);
|
0x010000000000ULL, CSR1212_ALL_SPACE_END);
|
||||||
if (!scsi_id->status_fifo_addr) {
|
if (!scsi_id->status_fifo_addr) {
|
||||||
SBP2_ERR("failed to allocate status FIFO address range");
|
SBP2_ERR("failed to allocate status FIFO address range");
|
||||||
goto failed_alloc;
|
goto failed_alloc;
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user