md: When RAID5 is dirty, force reconstruct-write instead of read-modify-write.
Signed-off-by: Alex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Suggested-by: Yair Hershko <yair@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
NeilBrown
parent
b97390aec4
commit
a7854487cd
@@ -2806,12 +2806,25 @@ static void handle_stripe_dirtying(struct r5conf *conf,
|
|||||||
int disks)
|
int disks)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int rmw = 0, rcw = 0, i;
|
int rmw = 0, rcw = 0, i;
|
||||||
if (conf->max_degraded == 2) {
|
sector_t recovery_cp = conf->mddev->recovery_cp;
|
||||||
/* RAID6 requires 'rcw' in current implementation
|
|
||||||
* Calculate the real rcw later - for now fake it
|
/* RAID6 requires 'rcw' in current implementation.
|
||||||
|
* Otherwise, check whether resync is now happening or should start.
|
||||||
|
* If yes, then the array is dirty (after unclean shutdown or
|
||||||
|
* initial creation), so parity in some stripes might be inconsistent.
|
||||||
|
* In this case, we need to always do reconstruct-write, to ensure
|
||||||
|
* that in case of drive failure or read-error correction, we
|
||||||
|
* generate correct data from the parity.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (conf->max_degraded == 2 ||
|
||||||
|
(recovery_cp < MaxSector && sh->sector >= recovery_cp)) {
|
||||||
|
/* Calculate the real rcw later - for now make it
|
||||||
* look like rcw is cheaper
|
* look like rcw is cheaper
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
rcw = 1; rmw = 2;
|
rcw = 1; rmw = 2;
|
||||||
|
pr_debug("force RCW max_degraded=%u, recovery_cp=%llu sh->sector=%llu\n",
|
||||||
|
conf->max_degraded, (unsigned long long)recovery_cp,
|
||||||
|
(unsigned long long)sh->sector);
|
||||||
} else for (i = disks; i--; ) {
|
} else for (i = disks; i--; ) {
|
||||||
/* would I have to read this buffer for read_modify_write */
|
/* would I have to read this buffer for read_modify_write */
|
||||||
struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
|
struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user