diff --git a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
index 0effd3cba9a7..98bf0c222b5f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
@@ -186,8 +186,9 @@ enum which_ebpf_reg {
  * separate frame pointer, so BPF_REG_10 relative accesses are
  * adjusted to be $sp relative.
  */
-int ebpf_to_mips_reg(struct jit_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
-		     enum which_ebpf_reg w)
+static int ebpf_to_mips_reg(struct jit_ctx *ctx,
+			    const struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			    enum which_ebpf_reg w)
 {
 	int ebpf_reg = (w == src_reg || w == src_reg_no_fp) ?
 		insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f02367faa58d..944ccc310201 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array,
 		}					\
 _out:							\
 		rcu_read_unlock();			\
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();		\
+		preempt_enable();			\
 		_ret;					\
 	 })
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6c5a41f7f338..09d5d972c9ff 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4138,15 +4138,35 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_func_state *state,
+				     struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
+				     enum bpf_reg_type type, u16 new_range)
+{
+	struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
+		reg = &state->regs[i];
+		if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id)
+			/* keep the maximum range already checked */
+			reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range);
+	}
+
+	bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
+		if (!reg)
+			continue;
+		if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id)
+			reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range);
+	}
+}
+
 static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
 				   struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
 				   enum bpf_reg_type type,
 				   bool range_right_open)
 {
-	struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe];
-	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg;
 	u16 new_range;
-	int i, j;
+	int i;
 
 	if (dst_reg->off < 0 ||
 	    (dst_reg->off == 0 && range_right_open))
@@ -4211,20 +4231,9 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
 	 * the range won't allow anything.
 	 * dst_reg->off is known < MAX_PACKET_OFF, therefore it fits in a u16.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
-		if (regs[i].type == type && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id)
-			/* keep the maximum range already checked */
-			regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range);
-
-	for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) {
-		state = vstate->frame[j];
-		bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
-			if (!reg)
-				continue;
-			if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id)
-				reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range);
-		}
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i <= vstate->curframe; i++)
+		__find_good_pkt_pointers(vstate->frame[i], dst_reg, type,
+					 new_range);
 }
 
 /* compute branch direction of the expression "if (reg opcode val) goto target;"
@@ -4698,6 +4707,22 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_func_state *state,
 	}
 }
 
+static void __mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_func_state *state, u32 id,
+				    bool is_null)
+{
+	struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
+		mark_ptr_or_null_reg(state, &state->regs[i], id, is_null);
+
+	bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
+		if (!reg)
+			continue;
+		mark_ptr_or_null_reg(state, reg, id, is_null);
+	}
+}
+
 /* The logic is similar to find_good_pkt_pointers(), both could eventually
  * be folded together at some point.
  */
@@ -4705,10 +4730,10 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
 				  bool is_null)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe];
-	struct bpf_reg_state *reg, *regs = state->regs;
+	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs;
 	u32 ref_obj_id = regs[regno].ref_obj_id;
 	u32 id = regs[regno].id;
-	int i, j;
+	int i;
 
 	if (ref_obj_id && ref_obj_id == id && is_null)
 		/* regs[regno] is in the " == NULL" branch.
@@ -4717,17 +4742,8 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
 		 */
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference_state(state, id));
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
-		mark_ptr_or_null_reg(state, &regs[i], id, is_null);
-
-	for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) {
-		state = vstate->frame[j];
-		bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
-			if (!reg)
-				continue;
-			mark_ptr_or_null_reg(state, reg, id, is_null);
-		}
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i <= vstate->curframe; i++)
+		__mark_ptr_or_null_regs(vstate->frame[i], id, is_null);
 }
 
 static bool try_match_pkt_pointers(const struct bpf_insn *insn,
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index e0c650d91784..994a7e0d16fb 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1151,6 +1151,9 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
 				return -1;
 			}
 			NEXT_ARG();
+		} else {
+			p_err("unknown arg %s", *argv);
+			return -1;
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
index 4db74758c674..fecb78afea3f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 libbpf_version.h
 FEATURE-DUMP.libbpf
 test_libbpf
+libbpf.so.*
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index fb11240b758b..9093a8f64dc6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -374,6 +374,31 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
+{
+	"calls: ptr null check in subprog",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 3),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.retval = 0,
+},
 {
 	"calls: two calls with args",
 	.insns = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
index e3fc22e672c2..d5c596fdc4b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
@@ -631,3 +631,25 @@
 	.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 },
+{
+	"direct packet access: test29 (reg > pkt_end in subprog)",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_6),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+},