[SPARC64] mm: don't re-evaluate *ptep
sparc64 prom_callback and new_setup_frame32 each operates on a user page table without holding lock, and no doubt they've good reason. But I'd feel more confident if they were to do a "pte = *ptep" and then operate on pte, rather than re-evaluating *ptep. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
5a820fa7e1
commit
b8ae48656d
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ int prom_callback(long *args)
|
||||
pud_t *pudp;
|
||||
pmd_t *pmdp;
|
||||
pte_t *ptep;
|
||||
pte_t pte;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_process(p) {
|
||||
mm = p->mm;
|
||||
@@ -178,8 +179,9 @@ int prom_callback(long *args)
|
||||
* being called from inside OBP.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, va);
|
||||
if (pte_present(*ptep)) {
|
||||
tte = pte_val(*ptep);
|
||||
pte = *ptep;
|
||||
if (pte_present(pte)) {
|
||||
tte = pte_val(pte);
|
||||
res = PROM_TRUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
pte_unmap(ptep);
|
||||
@@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ int prom_callback(long *args)
|
||||
pud_t *pudp;
|
||||
pmd_t *pmdp;
|
||||
pte_t *ptep;
|
||||
pte_t pte;
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((va >= LOW_OBP_ADDRESS) && (va < HI_OBP_ADDRESS)) {
|
||||
@@ -240,8 +243,9 @@ int prom_callback(long *args)
|
||||
* being called from inside OBP.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ptep = pte_offset_kernel(pmdp, va);
|
||||
if (pte_present(*ptep)) {
|
||||
tte = pte_val(*ptep);
|
||||
pte = *ptep;
|
||||
if (pte_present(pte)) {
|
||||
tte = pte_val(pte);
|
||||
res = PROM_TRUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user