[libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info
The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually writing in the hex mask. Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static int ali_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
|
||||
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48,
|
||||
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
|
||||
.udma_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA4,
|
||||
.port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops
|
||||
};
|
||||
/* Revision 0xC3 is UDMA66 for now */
|
||||
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int ali_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
|
||||
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48,
|
||||
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
|
||||
.udma_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA4,
|
||||
.port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops
|
||||
};
|
||||
/* Revision 0xC4 is UDMA100 */
|
||||
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static int ali_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
|
||||
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48,
|
||||
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
|
||||
.udma_mask = 0x3f,
|
||||
.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA5,
|
||||
.port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops
|
||||
};
|
||||
/* Revision 0xC5 is UDMA133 with LBA48 DMA */
|
||||
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static int ali_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
|
||||
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
|
||||
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
|
||||
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
|
||||
.udma_mask = 0x7f,
|
||||
.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
|
||||
.port_ops = &ali_c5_port_ops
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user