[SCSI] libfc: RNN_ID may be required before RSNN_NN with some switches
One could interpret FC-GS-5 to say that an explicit RNN_ID is required before RSNN_NN is allowed to succeed, which is why RNN_ID was not obsoleted along with RPN_ID acording to this document: ftp://ftp.t11.org/t11/member/fc/gs-5/05-546v2.pdf Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
James Bottomley
parent
28cc0e31d8
commit
c9c7bd7a5e
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ enum fc_lport_state {
|
||||
LPORT_ST_DISABLED = 0,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_FLOGI,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_DNS,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_RNN_ID,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_RFT_ID,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_SCR,
|
||||
LPORT_ST_READY,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user